Thursday, August 16, 2012

Hard Decisions

I was listening to Capitol Public Radio (NPR) this morning when the NPR reporter interviewed a politician from, well it makes no never mind because it is all the same.  They (the politicians) had to make some hard decisions in order to balance the budget -- so they closed a hospice for the elderly.  Now, just how is that a hard decision? The vast majority of people living in a hospice cannot vote.  Those childre3n who will be affected by reductions in free and reduced lunch, aid to families with dependent children, MIC, mental health programs, recreation centers and more -- they are all children and cannot vote.  How about the "hard decision" to cut education?  Realize that by the numbers there are only about 24% of parents who might vote -- no big deal, a politician can still weather those numbers and be re-elected.  That is, especially if they do not want to make "the easy" cuts -- like tax incentives for corporations, tax breaks for the very, very wealthy.  Those folks thank you/ask you by way of millions of dollars to campaign funds.  So, why would the politicians want to make those cuts?  What makes matters all that much worse is so many middle class and working poor actually believe it.  After all, why would they lose a tax break or some services simply because the rich are not to be touched?  Certainly these are hard decisions -- no one would intentionally want to hurt me, right:?

2 comments:

JCF said...

I noticed the same thing last weekend, when Paul Ryan was being rolled out: quoting him extensively re "hard choices" and "difficult decisions" and "taking responsibility" (i.e., a burden).

Hard for whom? Difficult for whom? A burden for whom???

Not the billionaires whose taxes they want to cut EVEN MORE than GWB did!

But oh, they speak that rhetoric w/ such gravitas---we're supposed to fall at their feet and worship them in their maturity and integrity.

I call bullsh*t! >:-(

Fred Schwartz said...

Yes, I believe that your choice of word is outstanding!